Skip to content

Validate Next.js version #46

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Validate Next.js version #46

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2020

Conversation

ehmicky
Copy link

@ehmicky ehmicky commented Nov 17, 2020

Part of #25

This adds some validation checks to ensure that users are not using an old version of Next.js.
This also prints a warning for users with Next.js 10.

@ehmicky ehmicky added the type: feature code contributing to the implementation of a feature and/or user facing functionality label Nov 17, 2020
@ehmicky ehmicky self-assigned this Nov 17, 2020
@ehmicky ehmicky mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2020
@ehmicky ehmicky merged commit 3428aaf into main Nov 17, 2020
@ehmicky ehmicky deleted the feat/next-version-check branch November 17, 2020 20:04
ascorbic pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2021
serhalp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2024
* feat: add FETCH cache

Fixes https://linear.app/netlify/issue/FRA-60/implement-get-and-set

* chore: close the connection

* chore: update

* chore: update

* chore: increase lambda timeout

* chore: fix tests

* chore: cleanup

* chore: cleanup and splitup for better performance

* chore: update

* chore: update

* chore: build custom test sharding as the fetch test needs to run on it's own executor due to side effects of next.js patching the fetch function

* chore: update
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature code contributing to the implementation of a feature and/or user facing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants